Khololwam Montsi vs Timothy Carlsson Seger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Jul at 10:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Montsi vs T. Carlsson Seger

RSA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Montsi 1 - 0 Seger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Khololwam Montsi winning 2 and Timothy Carlsson Seger winning 0. The last match between Khololwam Montsi and Timothy Carlsson Seger was at the M15 Hillcrest, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Khololwam Montsi getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Montsi | 1 |
| Seger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Hillcrest(07-09-25)
K. Montsi vs T. C. Seger H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.19% (62-41) | Career Total W/L | 60.00% (12-8) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Montsi vs T. C. Seger Match Preview:
- Seger has a slight advantage in second serve performance, winning 48.57% of points compared to Montsi's 46.05% over recent months. Could this be pivotal in securing the match?
- Montsi leads in the return game, capturing 47.3% of their opponent's second serve points, while Seger achieves 40.48%. Does this return strength give Montsi an edge?
- Both players are relatively equal in first serve returns, with Seger at 27.94% and Montsi at 27.78%.
- Under pressure, Montsi has saved slightly more breakpoints at 40.91% versus Seger's 40%.
- In the past year, Seger has been more successful overall, winning 71.43% of their matches, compared to Montsi's 50% win rate.
- Seger's best surface is Hard courts, with a win rate of 83%, while Montsi excels on Clay, with a 64% success rate.
- When it comes to the event level, both have played mainly in $10K tournaments, with Seger winning 71.43% of matches and Montsi 50%.
- Seger's opponents have been of higher quality, with an average rank of 118.71, compared to Montsi's 232.17.
- In deciding sets, Seger is unbeaten over the last year, winning 100% of these sets, whereas Montsi has not won any.
- Seger converts breakpoints at a higher rate, at 40%, while Montsi is lower at 30.77%.
Editorial Prediction (July 8, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the head-to-head statistics, Seger appears to have an edge in crucial areas, particularly in recent performance and match wins. The second serve success and higher breakpoint conversion offer important advantages.
Montsi, while showing strong return capabilities, particularly on second serves, may struggle under the quality of opponents that Seger is accustomed to facing.
Seger's undefeated record in deciding sets marks a significant psychological advantage, potentially making them more resilient in tight moments.
While Montsi has strengths, such as a robust return game on opponent second serves, the comprehensive edge lies with Seger.
Based on the factual data and recent performance trends, Seger is the likely winner in this upcoming match.
Khololwam Montsi vs Timothy Carlsson Seger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Montsi vs T. C. Seger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:46:25 | Average Match Time | 1:46:25 |
| 61% (35/57) | 1st Serve % | 61% (46/75) |
| 69% (24/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (29/46) |
| 64% (14/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (13/29) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 44% (33/75) | Return Points Win % | 33% (19/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Montsi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-7(1) 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
T. C. Seger Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 5-7 6-2 10-7 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||

K. Montsi vs T. C. Seger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.19% (62/41) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 58.85% (133/93) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.78% (26/19) |
| 53.52% (1058/919) | Games Win/Loss | 52.56% (236/213) |
| 60.92% (53/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (6/3) |
| 60.00% (9/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.55% (6/5) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 95 | Aces Total | 37 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 182 | Total Double Faults | 40 |
| 1:24:22 | Average Match Time | 1:15:37 |
| 472.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 57.3 |
| 63% (3441/5439) | 1st Serve % | 64% (635/997) |
| 63% (2156/3441) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (395/635) |
| 51% (1024/1997) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (188/362) |
| 50% (314/631) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (40/89) |
| 44% (2422/5514) | Return Points Win % | 39% (362/917) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.62% (61/38) | Futures W/L | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 60% (56/93) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (10/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 50% (12/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 86% (64/55) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (12/11) |
| 14% (64/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (12/1) |
| 18% (39/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (8/1) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
